Appearance Policies with Different Requirements for Women and Men Are Not Necessarily Discriminatory
-
expand disabled
Jesperson v. Harrah's Operating Company, 444 Fed.3d 1104 (2006) (0 other reports)
Author: Jill Gormley, Strong and Clear Communications
In Jesperson v. Harrah's Operating Company, +444 Fed.3d 1104 (2006), the 9th Circuit considered whether a grooming policy that imposes differing standards for women and men was discriminatory.
To continue reading, register for free access now.
Register Now
Already a Brightmine HR and Compliance Center user?
Log in
