Claims of Age Discrimination Can Be Subject to Mandatory Arbitration
-
expand disabled
Gilmer v. Interstate/Johnson Lane Corporation, 500 U.S. 20 (1991) (0 other reports)
Author: Lisa Pierson Weinberger, Mom, Esq.
In Gilmer v. Interstate/Johnson Lane Corporation, +500 U.S. 20 (1991), the United States Supreme Court addressed whether an employee can be required to arbitrate a claim under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA) based upon a prior agreement to arbitrate disputes.
To continue reading, register for free access now.
Register Now
Already a Brightmine HR and Compliance Center user?
Log in
