Employers Have Greater Burden of Proof in Defending Disparate Impact Claims under the ADEA
This report relates to 1 case(s)
Meacham v. Knolls Atomic Power Laboratory et al., 554 U.S. 84 (2008) (0 other reports)
Author: Melanie J. Perez-Vellios, VP Group LLC
In Meacham v. Knolls Atomic Power Laboratory et al., +554 U.S. 84 (2008), the United States Supreme Court analyzed whether an employer carries both the burden of production and the burden of persuasion when defending against a disparate impact discrimination claim on the basis that the employer used reasonable factors other than age in its employment determination.