Employers Have Greater Burden of Proof in Defending Disparate Impact Claims under the ADEA
-
expand disabled
Meacham v. Knolls Atomic Power Laboratory et al., 554 U.S. 84 (2008) (0 other reports)
Author: Melanie J. Perez-Vellios, VP Group LLC
In Meacham v. Knolls Atomic Power Laboratory et al., +554 U.S. 84 (2008), the United States Supreme Court analyzed whether an employer carries both the burden of production and the burden of persuasion when defending against a disparate impact discrimination claim on the basis that the employer used reasonable factors other than age in its employment determination.
To continue reading, register for free access now.
Register Now
Already a Brightmine HR and Compliance Center user?
Log in
