Overview: Employee benefit programs typically account for one-third of employee compensation costs. HR professionals are charged with managing this investment wisely. This includes ensuring compliance, controlling costs, having an effective communication strategy and making sure the benefits program attracts, retains and engages employees.
This is especially challenging in light of rising health care costs and an increasingly complex regulatory environment. With only so many dollars to spend on employee benefits a key part of the strategy is to determine how much to invest so that both the needs of the employee and the employer are met. The regulatory environment has a significant impact on how employee benefit plans are designed and administered as employers ensure plans are operated in compliance with ERISA, COBRA and HIPAA.
Having a benefits strategy that is linked to business strategy can serve as a significant competitive advantage for employers. Clearly aligning the vision of employee benefit programs with the employer's business goals demonstrates how HR functions as a business partner and contributes to the bottom line. Effective benefit communications can support this vision and will ensure that both employers and employees get the most from the substantial investment in benefits.
Trends: The newer requirements of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA), commonly referred to as Health Care Reform or Obamacare, in addition to the repeal of section 3 of the Defense of Marriage Act will challenge HR professionals in both the short and the long-term as they monitor developments and adjust benefit strategies accordingly.
Author: Tracy Morley, SPHR, Legal Editor
XpertHR's High-Tech Resource Center for HR helps high-tech employers handle their most challenging employment issues by bringing relevant resources together in one place for easy access.
In-depth review of the spectrum of Arkansas employment law requirements HR must follow with respect to unemployment insurance tax (FUTA/SUTA).
The IRS issued Notice 2014-19 and related Frequently Asked Questions providing guidance on how qualified retirement plans should treat same-sex spouses following the Supreme Court's decision in United States v. Windsor. Employers must take action to ensure that plan documents and operations conform to requirements.
XpertHR provides an insider's look at a Supreme Court case that asks if an employer may deny contraceptive coverage to its employees on religious grounds under the Affordable Care Act. Hear why this might be the most significant dispute of the Court's term.
As mandated by San Francisco's Office of Labor Standards Enforcement, all San Francisco employers subject to the Health Care Security Ordinance must post the San Francisco Health Care Security Ordinance Poster.
A divided Supreme Court heard lively 90-minute arguments on March 25 in a major employment case that asks whether corporations may deny contraceptive coverage to their employees on religious grounds under the Affordable Care Act. A decision is expected by late June.
In-depth review of the spectrum of New Mexico employment law requirements HR must follow with respect to unemployment insurance tax.
A California court determined whether an employee should retain her eligibility for unemployment benefits when her employer claimed that she "constructively quit" her job by making unreasonable demands.
Two Employment Law Manual sections and a Legal Insight have been updated to reflect final ACA information reporting requirements.
A Worked Example and LiveFlo have been updated to reflect final ACA regulations recently issued by the Obama administration.
HR and legal considerations for employers regarding employee benefit programs. Support on following regulations and requirements on this topic.