Overview: The Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) was written in 1938, at a time when manufacturing and agriculture dominated the American economy. The law's structure for employee classification as exempt or nonexempt from minimum wage laws and overtime requirements reflects that simpler time. Although it has been updated periodically in the decades since, the FLSA's classification scheme is often difficult to apply to more modern service- and information-related jobs.
One type of employee that has proven especially difficult to fit into the employee classification structure – and has also been the plaintiff in hundreds of lawsuits – is managers. Today's lean, flexible workplace often necessitates that managers pitch in and perform nonexempt work, rather than stand around with a clipboard in hand directing other employees. The more nonexempt work they do, the more likely it is they need to be paid overtime.
Complicating matters is the fact that employees' job duties change frequently. Employers often make the mistake of classifying all employees with a particular job title as exempt. When changes in the workplace necessitate changes in an employee's job duties, that classification can be jeopardized. HR is well-positioned to stay on top of these changes, and must remember that FLSA classification is an ongoing challenge, not a one-time task.
In addition, it's important that employers follow state requirements regarding employee classification.
Trends: The two-headed dragon of employee lawsuits and government enforcement continues to make FLSA classification a key concern for HR. Many lawsuits have been collective actions, in which hundreds and sometimes even thousands of similarly situated employees sue as a group. The standard for certifying these collective actions is relatively lenient compared to other employment laws, and for many years, most courts allowed them to proceed. Recently, the pendulum appears to be swinging in the other direction, with more and more courts taking a more stringent stance on whether employees truly are similar enough to sue as a group.
Author: Michael Cardman, Legal Editor
Newly revised IRS procedures allow independent contractors to stop or prevent backup withholding on reportable employer payments by validating and presenting a Social Security card to an employer.
In-depth review of the spectrum of Maine employment law requirements HR must follow with respect to recruiting.
In-depth review of the spectrum of Federal employment law requirements HR must follow with respect to Managing Employees in Special Situations
In-depth review of the spectrum of California employment law requirements HR must follow with respect to employee classification.
An employer may not pay commission wages on a monthly basis and then retroactively attribute them to the weeks of the monthly period in which they were earned, the Supreme Court of California ruled in Peabody v. Time Warner Cable, Inc.
In-depth review of the spectrum of Nevada employment law requirements HR must follow with respect to employee classification.
The Nevada Supreme Court's ruling in Thomas v. Nev. Yellow Cab Corp. effectively eliminates minimum wage exemptions for certain casual babysitters, domestic service employees, outside salespersons, taxicab and limousine drivers, agricultural employees and workers with disabilities.
Use this workflow to determine if an employee is exempt or nonexempt from the minimum wage or overtime requirements of the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA).
A PowerPoint presentation on Employee Classification has been published to be used in conjunction with our Supervisor Briefing. Each of our presentations is specifically designed as a training resource to address critical HR-related issues faced by your managers and supervisors.
In-depth review of the spectrum of Maryland employment law requirements HR must follow with respect to Employee Classification.
HR guidance on complying with the FLSA and state employee classification requirements. Support on following rules and regulations regarding this topic.