Overview: The Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) was written in 1938, at a time when manufacturing and agriculture dominated the American economy. The law's structure for employee classification as exempt or nonexempt from minimum wage laws and overtime requirements reflects that simpler time. Although it has been updated periodically in the decades since, the FLSA's classification scheme is often difficult to apply to more modern service- and information-related jobs.
One type of employee that has proven especially difficult to fit into the employee classification structure – and has also been the plaintiff in hundreds of lawsuits – is managers. Today's lean, flexible workplace often necessitates that managers pitch in and perform nonexempt work, rather than stand around with a clipboard in hand directing other employees. The more nonexempt work they do, the more likely it is they need to be paid overtime.
Complicating matters is the fact that employees' job duties change frequently. Employers often make the mistake of classifying all employees with a particular job title as exempt. When changes in the workplace necessitate changes in an employee's job duties, that classification can be jeopardized. HR is well-positioned to stay on top of these changes, and must remember that FLSA classification is an ongoing challenge, not a one-time task.
In addition, it's important that employers follow state requirements regarding employee classification.
Trends: The two-headed dragon of employee lawsuits and government enforcement continues to make FLSA classification a key concern for HR. Many lawsuits have been collective actions, in which hundreds and sometimes even thousands of similarly situated employees sue as a group. The standard for certifying these collective actions is relatively lenient compared to other employment laws, and for many years, most courts allowed them to proceed. Recently, the pendulum appears to be swinging in the other direction, with more and more courts taking a more stringent stance on whether employees truly are similar enough to sue as a group.
Author: Michael Cardman, Legal Editor
The US Supreme Court has agreed to hear an appeal of Navarro v. Encino Motorcars, LLC, in which the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that auto dealership service advisors are not eligible for an Fair Labor Standards Act overtime exemption.
In-depth review of the spectrum of California employment law requirements HR must follow with respect to employee classification.
In-depth review of the spectrum of New York employment law requirements HR must follow with respect to employee classification.
Seattle has become the first US city to allow drivers for Uber, Lyft and other ride-hailing company apps to unionize. The Seattle City Council voted unanimously to enact this groundbreaking measure. But Uber may challenge the ordinance in court, so this is likely not the last word on the issue.
In-depth review of the spectrum of Texas employment law requirements HR must follow with respect to independent contractors.
The Supreme Court recently denied a coalition of industry groups' request to postpone new regulations that make direct care workers -- such as home health aides, personal care aides and certified nursing assistants -- eligible for overtime pay.
Worm farming can be considered agriculture for purposes of the Fair Labor Standards Act, the 6th Circuit Court of Appeals held in Barks v. Silver Bait, LLC.
Services and construction giant Halliburton misclassified about 1,000 salaried employees in 28 job positions as exempt from the Fair Labor Standards Act, according to the US Department of Labor.
The 11th Circuit Court of Appeals has adopted an employer-friendly standard for determining whether an intern should be considered an employee entitled to the minimum wage and overtime under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) in Schumann v. Collier Anesthesia, P.A.
Unpaid internships or training programs can result in a lawsuit for back wages and overtime under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) unless specific criteria are satisfied. This Legal Insight analyzes standards established by the US Department of Labor and by the federal courts in an effort to guide employers that may wish to establish unpaid internships or training programs.
HR guidance on complying with the FLSA and state employee classification requirements. Support on following rules and regulations regarding this topic.