HR Support on Exempt and Non-Exempt Employee Classification

Editor's Note: One of the trickiest compliance challenges for HR.

Michael CardmanOverview: The Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) was written in 1938, at a time when manufacturing and agriculture dominated the American economy. The law's structure for employee classification as exempt or nonexempt from minimum wage laws and overtime requirements reflects that simpler time. Although it has been updated periodically in the decades since, the FLSA's classification scheme is often difficult to apply to more modern service- and information-related jobs.

One type of employee that has proven especially difficult to fit into the employee classification structure – and has also been the plaintiff in hundreds of lawsuits – is managers. Today's lean, flexible workplace often necessitates that managers pitch in and perform nonexempt work, rather than stand around with a clipboard in hand directing other employees. The more nonexempt work they do, the more likely it is they need to be paid overtime.

Complicating matters is the fact that employees' job duties change frequently. Employers often make the mistake of classifying all employees with a particular job title as exempt. When changes in the workplace necessitate changes in an employee's job duties, that classification can be jeopardized. HR is well-positioned to stay on top of these changes, and must remember that FLSA classification is an ongoing challenge, not a one-time task.

In addition, it's important that employers follow state requirements regarding employee classification.

Trends: The two-headed dragon of employee lawsuits and government enforcement continues to make FLSA classification a key concern for HR. Many lawsuits have been collective actions, in which hundreds and sometimes even thousands of similarly situated employees sue as a group. The standard for certifying these collective actions is relatively lenient compared to other employment laws, and for many years, most courts allowed them to proceed. Recently, the pendulum appears to be swinging in the other direction, with more and more courts taking a more stringent stance on whether employees truly are similar enough to sue as a group.

Author: Michael Cardman, Legal Editor

Latest items in Employee Classification

  • Managing Employees in Special Situations

    Type:
    Employment Law Manual

    In-depth review of the spectrum of Federal employment law requirements HR must follow with respect to Managing Employees in Special Situations

  • Employee Classifications Handbook Statement: California

    Type:
    Employee Handbooks

    California employers that are covered by the California Labor Code and Wage Orders and the federal Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA), which require employers to properly classify their employees, should consider including this model policy statement in their handbook.

  • Workers' Compensation: Montana

    Type:
    Employment Law Manual

    In-depth review of the spectrum of Montana employment law requirements HR must follow with respect to workers' compensation.

  • DOL Ramping Up Investigations of Employers That Use Independent Contractors, Temp Agencies

    Date:
    06 March 2015
    Type:
    News

    According to new statistics, a greater proportion of the US Department of Labor's enforcement actions are being targeted at industries that commonly use franchising, independent contractors, subcontracting and third-party intermediaries such as temporary employment agencies or labor brokers.

  • Affordable Care Act Podcast: What HR Needs to Know in 2015

    Date:
    12 February 2015
    Type:
    Editor's Choice

    What must employers know about the Affordable Care Act in 2015? A new XpertHR podcast features insights from New Jersey employment attorney Jim Anelli, who heads LeClairRyan's Affordable Care Act team about the latest developments involving the ACA.

  • New Jersey Supreme Court Clarifies Criteria for Independent Contractors: Employment Law Manual Updated

    Date:
    26 January 2015
    Type:
    Editor's Choice

    The Independent Contractors: New Jersey section of the Employment Law Manual has been updated to reflect the New Jersey Supreme Court's ruling that the ABC Test must be used to determine whether a worker is an employee or an independent contractor under the state's overtime and wage payment laws.

  • Companionship Exemption Regulations Vacated: Employment Law Manual Updated

    Date:
    21 January 2015
    Type:
    Editor's Choice

    The Employment Law Manual and a How To have been updated to reflect a recent federal court ruling vacating two US Department of Labor regulations for companionship service providers.

  • Florida Partners With Federal Government to Enforce Employee Classification Laws

    Date:
    16 January 2015
    Type:
    News

    The Florida Department of Revenue has agreed to coordinate with the US Department of Labor (DOL) in its efforts to prevent the misclassification of employees as independent contractors.

  • Court Nixes Overtime for Companionship Services Providers

    Date:
    15 January 2015
    Type:
    News

    In Home Care Ass'n of Am. v. Weil, the United States District Court for the District of Columbia vacated a regulation from the US Department of Labor that would have narrowed the duties a companion may perform to qualify for an exemption from the minimum wage and overtime requirements of the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA).

  • Podcast: Why Wage Theft Trend Cannot Be Ignored

    Date:
    06 January 2015
    Type:
    Editor's Choice

    With wage theft claims ensnaring an increasing number of US employers, XpertHR Legal Editor Michael Cardman discusses this troubling trend and steps well-intentioned employers can take to avoid a lawsuit in the latest XpertHR podcast.