Overview: To prevent and respond to employee discrimination based on protected class status, an employer must have zero-tolerance policy against this discrimination and communicate to their workforce that discrimination against any individual based on protected class status will not be tolerated.
Employers should understand that Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 prohibits discrimination based on race, color, sex, religion and national origin. Among the other federal laws that prohibit discrimination are the Americans with Disabilities Act (disability), the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act (genetic information) and the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (age). State laws generally prohibit employee discrimination against the same classes protected by federal law. However, some state laws go further and consider gender identity/sexual orientation, unemployment status, and marital status to be protected classes.
An employer should implement a policy against discrimination and make sure that all employees and supervisors receive training on the policy An employer should develop and implement policies and practices that are facially neutral and do not discriminate. Further, employers should establish a multi-channeled complaint system and promptly respond to all discrimination complaints by immediately investigating and if necessary, take corrective measures and impose discipline.
Trends: There is a great deal of movement on the federal and state level to expand the protected classes under equal employment opportunity laws. Those protected under discrimination laws have advanced well beyond the traditional protected classes of race, sex, age, and disability to include genetic information, military status, transgender status, individuals with caregiving responsibilities and even unemployment status. As a result, employers can reasonably anticipate a greater number of lawsuits. Further, employers should know that there is also a trend towards class actions and allegations of widespread bias and discrimination by multiple plaintiffs. Employers need to know how to prevent and effectively respond to such claims.
Author: Beth P. Zoller, JD, Legal Editor
The Florida Supreme Court has clarified that an employer may not discriminate against employees and applicants based on pregnancy under the Florida Civil Rights Act (FCRA).
In-depth review of the spectrum of Indiana employment law requirements HR must follow with respect to EEO - discrimination.
On March 25, 2014, Indiana Governor Mike Pence signed a law aimed at creating employment opportunities for veterans.
The United States District Court for the District of Columbia denied an employer's motion to dismiss a homosexual employee's claim that he was discriminated against for failing to conform to the employer's traditional male stereotypes.
In-depth review of the spectrum of Maryland employment law requirements HR must follow with respect to disabilities (ADA).
The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) may entitle an employee with an ADA-protected disability to a reasonable accommodation that enables the employee to perform the essential functions of his or her job. While Title I of the ADA does not specifically address service animals in the workplace, a service animal may be a reasonable accommodation to an employee with a disability under the ADA.
In an effort to enforce equal pay laws and combat wage discrimination, on April 8 - National Equal Pay Day - President Obama signed two executive measures aimed at federal contractors. Based on these measures, federal contractors should review their compensation policies and practices to make sure they comply with the equal pay laws.
A discussion of the Pregnant Workers Fairness Act prohibiting discrimination against workers affected by pregnancy, childbirth and related medical conditions has been added to four sections of the Employment Law Manual.
HR guidance and support on how to develop and implement policies to prevent and respond to employee discrimination claims against protected classes.