Overview: To prevent and respond to employee discrimination based on protected class status, an employer must have zero-tolerance policy against this discrimination and communicate to their workforce that discrimination against any individual based on protected class status will not be tolerated.
Employers should understand that Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 prohibits discrimination based on race, color, sex, religion and national origin. Among the other federal laws that prohibit discrimination are the Americans with Disabilities Act (disability), the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act (genetic information) and the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (age). State laws generally prohibit employee discrimination against the same classes protected by federal law. However, some state laws go further and consider gender identity/sexual orientation, unemployment status, and marital status to be protected classes.
An employer should implement a policy against discrimination and make sure that all employees and supervisors receive training on the policy An employer should develop and implement policies and practices that are facially neutral and do not discriminate. Further, employers should establish a multi-channeled complaint system and promptly respond to all discrimination complaints by immediately investigating and if necessary, take corrective measures and impose discipline.
Trends: There is a great deal of movement on the federal and state level to expand the protected classes under equal employment opportunity laws. Those protected under discrimination laws have advanced well beyond the traditional protected classes of race, sex, age, and disability to include genetic information, military status, transgender status, individuals with caregiving responsibilities and even unemployment status. As a result, employers can reasonably anticipate a greater number of lawsuits. Further, employers should know that there is also a trend towards class actions and allegations of widespread bias and discrimination by multiple plaintiffs. Employers need to know how to prevent and effectively respond to such claims.
Author: Beth P. Zoller, JD, Legal Editor
In-depth review of the spectrum of North Carolina employment law requirements HR must follow with respect to interviewing and selecting job candidates.
The Second Circuit Court of Appeals recently relaxed the standard for evaluating violations of the New York City Human Rights Law (NYCHRL), opening the door for more NYCHRL claims. Employers in NYC must be extra-vigilant in preventing and responding to incidents of workplace discrimination.
The Idaho Employment Law Manual sections on Discrimination, Terms of Employment, and Interviewing and Selecting Job Candidates have been updated to reflect two new ordinances that recently took effect in Pocatello and Coeur d'Alene prohibiting employment discrimination against lesbians, gays, bisexuals and transgender (LGBT) individuals.
Employers in Pocatello and Coeur D'Alene, Idaho, may need to revise their workplace policies and practices regarding discrimination, interviewing and hiring to comply with two new ordinances that recently went into effect (June 10 in Pocatello and June 7 in Coeur d'Alene).
The Minnesota Discrimination and Harassment sections were recently updated to reflect two new rulings clarifying the scope of the Minnesota Human Rights Act (MHRA).
The Nevada Discrimination, Retaliation and Employee Handbooks - Work Rules - Employee Conduct sections have been updated to reflect a new law that prohibits employers from discriminating or taking an adverse employment action against an individual who is a member of the Communist party. 2013 Bill Text NV S.B. 506.
Effective October 1, 2013, Nevada employers will be prohibited from discriminating or taking an adverse employment action against an individual who is a member of the Communist Party.
The 5th Circuit unanimously reversed a well-publicized lower court's ruling in a sex discrimination case and held for the first time that lactation is related to pregnancy and, therefore, covered by Title VII and the Pregnancy Discrimination Act (PDA). See EEOC v. Houston Funding II, 2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 10933.
In-depth review of the spectrum of New York employment law requirements HR must follow with respect to involuntary terminations.
HR guidance and support on how to develop and implement policies to prevent and respond to employee discrimination claims against protected classes.
Sorry, this feature is not yet available on the preview site