Overview: To prevent and respond to employee discrimination based on protected class status, an employer must have zero-tolerance policy against this discrimination and communicate to their workforce that discrimination against any individual based on protected class status will not be tolerated.
Employers should understand that Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 prohibits discrimination based on race, color, sex, religion and national origin. Among the other federal laws that prohibit discrimination are the Americans with Disabilities Act (disability), the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act (genetic information) and the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (age). State laws generally prohibit employee discrimination against the same classes protected by federal law. However, some state laws go further and consider gender identity/sexual orientation, unemployment status, and marital status to be protected classes.
An employer should implement a policy against discrimination and make sure that all employees and supervisors receive training on the policy An employer should develop and implement policies and practices that are facially neutral and do not discriminate. Further, employers should establish a multi-channeled complaint system and promptly respond to all discrimination complaints by immediately investigating and if necessary, take corrective measures and impose discipline.
Trends: There is a great deal of movement on the federal and state level to expand the protected classes under equal employment opportunity laws. Those protected under discrimination laws have advanced well beyond the traditional protected classes of race, sex, age, and disability to include genetic information, military status, transgender status, individuals with caregiving responsibilities and even unemployment status. As a result, employers can reasonably anticipate a greater number of lawsuits. Further, employers should know that there is also a trend towards class actions and allegations of widespread bias and discrimination by multiple plaintiffs. Employers need to know how to prevent and effectively respond to such claims.
Additionally, the EEOC has identified the following as priorities in its Strategic Enforcement Plan: targeting recruiting and hiring practices that discriminate against racial, ethnic and religious groups, older workers, women, and individuals with disabilities; protecting immigrant, migrant and other vulnerable workers from discrimination; addressing emerging issues in equal employment law based on societal legal, judicial and demographic changes (discrimination based on disabilities, pregnancy, sexual orientation and gender identity); enforcing equal pay laws; and enabling individuals to exercise their rights under employment discrimination laws.
Author: Beth P. Zoller, JD, Legal Editor
On June 26, 2015, the Supreme Court ruled in Obergefell v. Hodges that the Constitution requires all 50 states and the District of Columbia to license same-sex marriages and to recognize such marriages that are lawfully licensed and performed out of state.
The Texas Supreme Court has ordered the Houston City Council to either repeal the city's 2014 equal rights ordinance or place it on November's ballot. The ordinance prohibited discrimination based on a number of factors, most notably for sexual orientation and gender identity.
Under a new Oregon law, effective January 1, 2016, an employer may not discharge, demote, suspend, or discriminate or retaliate against an employee who has engaging in discussions regarding wages.
In-depth review of the spectrum of Delaware employment law requirements HR must follow with respect performance appraisals.
Effective January 1, 2016, California's Fair Employment and Housing Act will prohibit retaliation against a person for requesting a reasonable accommodation for his or her disability or religious beliefs.
In-depth review of the spectrum of Missouri employment law requirements HR must follow with respect to the terms of employment.
Overtime reform, discrimination in hiring claims and joint employer liability proved top concerns for employers, according to law firm Littler Mendelson's 4th Annual Executive Employer Survey Report.
North Dakota employers that employ one or more employees for more than one-quarter of the year should consider including this model policy statement in their handbook.
HR guidance and support on how to develop and implement policies to prevent and respond to employee discrimination claims against protected classes.