Overview: While the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA) only protects individuals who are 40 years of age and older from employee discrimination, some state laws, such as those in New York, New Jersey and the District of Columbia, protect individuals who are 18 and older from age discrimination. Age discrimination often arises when individuals receive unfair treatment in the workplace because of the mistaken belief that an older individual will not perform as well. As a result of this, an employer should avoid any preemployment inquiries or employment decisions that are based solely on an individual's age, and be careful about neutral workplace rules and practices that negatively affect older workers. Further, the issue of age discrimination also comes into play when considering the issue of retirement age.
An employer should recognize that it is permissible to differentiate on the basis of age if age is a bona fide occupational qualification. For example, an employer can discriminate based on age if individuals of a certain job cannot perform the essential job functions in a safe manner.
Employers should also be aware of the fact that there are special requirements with regard to the waiver of ADEA claims in settlement agreements and releases under the Older Workers Benefit Protection Act.
Trends: Employers should be aware that the EEOC recently issued a new rule which will make it harder for employers to establish that policies that discriminate based on age were justified based on a legitimate business reason and based on a reasonable factor other than age. It will require employers to show that they have a stated business purpose as well as that the employer considered and sought to reduce the impact of the policy on older workers. The EEOC has also identified protecting older workers as one of its priorities in its Strategic Enforcement Plan.
Employers also may reasonably anticipate a greater number of age discrimination lawsuits with the aging Baby Boomer population.
Author: Beth P. Zoller, JD, Legal Editor
In a first-of-its-kind ruling, the 11th Circuit has held that the disparate-impact provision in the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA) only covers discrimination against employees, not job applicants. The decision creates a split in the circuits that could lead to Supreme Court review.
This briefing for supervisors examines the law and best practices for avoiding age discrimination in the workplace.
In-depth review of the spectrum of Georgia employment law requirements HR must follow with respect to recruiting.
As mandated by the Minnesota Department of Labor and Industry, Labor Standards, all Minnesota employers must post the Minnesota Age Discrimination Poster.
As mandated by the Louisiana Workforce Commission, all Louisiana employers must post the Louisiana Age Discrimination Poster.
This legal insight analyzes Supreme Court precedent on the Reasonable Factor Other Than Age Defense and a new EEOC rule that makes it harder for employers to establish the RFOA defense in a disparate impact discrimination claim under the ADEA.
The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission remains focused on eliminating age discrimination. In 2012, the agency was very active, and in many instances victorious, in bringing age discrimination lawsuits against employers.
In Sprint/United Management Company v. Ellen Mendelsohn, 522 U.S. 379 (2008), the Supreme Court considered whether a plaintiff should be allowed to prove his or her discrimination claim by using evidence of alleged discrimination against other employees by other supervisors, often referred to as "me too" evidence.
In General Dynamics Land Systems, Inc. v. Dennis Cline et al., 540 U.S. 581 (2004), the Supreme Court addressed whether the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 prohibits reverse age discrimination.
HR guidance on policies and practices to combat age discrimination in the workplace.