HR Support on Avoiding Age Discrimination Issues

Editor's Note: Beware of age discrimination in hiring and employment practices.

Beth P. ZollerOverview: While the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA) only protects individuals who are 40 years of age and older from employee discrimination, some state laws, such as those in New York, New Jersey and the District of Columbia, protect individuals who are 18 and older from age discrimination. Age discrimination often arises when individuals receive unfair treatment in the workplace because of the mistaken belief that an older individual will not perform as well. As a result of this, an employer should avoid any preemployment inquiries or employment decisions that are based solely on an individual's age, and be careful about neutral workplace rules and practices that negatively affect older workers. Further, the issue of age discrimination also comes into play when considering the issue of retirement age.

An employer should recognize that it is permissible to differentiate on the basis of age if age is a bona fide occupational qualification. For example, an employer can discriminate based on age if individuals of a certain job cannot perform the essential job functions in a safe manner.

Employers should also be aware of the fact that there are special requirements with regard to the waiver of ADEA claims in settlement agreements and releases under the Older Workers Benefit Protection Act.

Trends: Employers should be aware that the EEOC recently issued a new rule which will make it harder for employers to establish that policies that discriminate based on age were justified based on a legitimate business reason and based on a reasonable factor other than age. It will require employers to show that they have a stated business purpose as well as that the employer considered and sought to reduce the impact of the policy on older workers. The EEOC has also identified protecting older workers as one of its priorities in its Strategic Enforcement Plan.

Employers also may reasonably anticipate a greater number of age discrimination lawsuits with the aging Baby Boomer population.

Author: Beth P. Zoller, JD, Legal Editor

New and Updated

  • Texas Roadhouse Settles EEOC Age Bias Lawsuit for $12 Million

    Date:
    April 4, 2017
    Type:
    News

    The Texas Roadhouse restaurant chain has agreed to pay $12 million to resolve a class action lawsuit in which the EEOC accused it of engaging in a nationwide pattern and practice of age discrimination in hiring.

  • Job Applicants May Not Bring ADEA Disparate-Impact Claims, 11th Circuit Finds

    Date:
    October 14, 2016
    Type:
    News

    In a first-of-its-kind ruling, the 11th Circuit has held that the disparate-impact provision in the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA) only covers discrimination against employees, not job applicants. The decision creates a split in the circuits that could lead to Supreme Court review.

  • Age Discrimination Prevention - Supervisor Briefing

    Type:
    Supervisor Training

    This briefing for supervisors examines the law and best practices for avoiding age discrimination in the workplace.

  • Recruiting: Georgia

    Type:
    Employment Law Manual

    In-depth review of the spectrum of Georgia employment law requirements HR must follow with respect to recruiting.

  • Minnesota Age Discrimination Poster

    Type:
    Policies and Documents

    As mandated by the Minnesota Department of Labor and Industry, Labor Standards, all Minnesota employers must post the Minnesota Age Discrimination Poster.

  • Louisiana Age Discrimination Poster

    Type:
    Policies and Documents

    As mandated by the Louisiana Workforce Commission, all Louisiana employers must post the Louisiana Age Discrimination Poster.

  • Type:
    Legal Insight

    This legal insight analyzes Supreme Court precedent on the Reasonable Factor Other Than Age Defense and a new EEOC rule that makes it harder for employers to establish the RFOA defense in a disparate impact discrimination claim under the ADEA.

  • Age Discrimination Remains Target for EEOC in Recent Cases

    Date:
    November 13, 2012
    Type:
    Law Reports

    The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission remains focused on eliminating age discrimination. In 2012, the agency was very active, and in many instances victorious, in bringing age discrimination lawsuits against employers.

  • Admissibility of "Me Too" Evidence Will Be on a Case-By-Case Basis

    Date:
    September 4, 2012
    Type:
    Law Reports

    In Sprint/United Management Company v. Ellen Mendelsohn, 522 U.S. 379 (2008), the Supreme Court considered whether a plaintiff should be allowed to prove his or her discrimination claim by using evidence of alleged discrimination against other employees by other supervisors, often referred to as "me too" evidence.

  • Employers May Favor Older Employees to the Detriment of Younger Employees Without Violating the ADEA

    Date:
    August 30, 2012
    Type:
    Law Reports

    In General Dynamics Land Systems, Inc. v. Dennis Cline et al., 540 U.S. 581 (2004), the Supreme Court addressed whether the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 prohibits reverse age discrimination.

About This Topic

HR guidance on policies and practices to combat age discrimination in the workplace.