Overview: The Pregnancy Discrimination Act is an amendment to Title VII which protects pregnant individuals from applicant and employee discrimination. Further, some state and local laws similarly prohibit discrimination against employees and applicants who are pregnant. Pregnant individuals also may be protected under federal and state family and medical leave acts. In order to be protected based on pregnancy, the employer must know that the individual is pregnant. To avoid pregnancy discrimination, employers should develop a policy against discrimination and provide employees and supervisors with training so that pregnant employees receive fair and equal treatment. Further, an employer needs to understand that it is required to treat pregnant employees the same as other similarly situated non-pregnant employees.
Trends: Employers should be aware that legislation has been introduced in both the House and the Senate that would require employers to provide reasonable accommodations to pregnant employees unless it would cause undue hardship for the employer. Some states such as New Jersey and Maryland as well as cities like New York City and Philadelphia have already made this a requirement. Further, the EEOC has recently filed a number of pregnancy discrimination lawsuits and is aggressively pursuing pregnancy discrimination in the workplace through its Strategic Enforcement Plan. It has labeled pregnancy discrimination as an emerging issue and it is working to combat pregnancy discrimination and ensure pregnancy accommodation. Employers should be alert and keep up with the rapid changes in this area of the law as it has become a hot topic in employment.
Author: Beth Zoller, JD, Legal Editor
Nebraska has amended its Fair Employment Practice Act to require reasonable accommodations for pregnancy, childbirth and related medical conditions.
In-depth review of the spectrum of Nebraska employment law requirements HR must follow with respect to Disability Related Leave; Requests for Accommodations.
The US Supreme Court held in Young v. UPS that employers are not required to accommodate pregnant employees under the Pregnancy Discrimination Act (PDA), but an employer may violate the PDA if it accommodates some employees but not pregnant employees.
Effective August 1, 2015, the North Dakota Human Rights Act will include a pregnancy accommodation requirement.
In-depth review of the spectrum of California employment law requirements HR must follow with respect to FMLA.
In-depth review of the spectrum of Wisconsin employment law requirements HR must follow with respect to FMLA.
In-depth review of the spectrum of Texas employment law requirements HR must follow with respect to FMLA.
In-depth review of the spectrum of Pennsylvania employment law requirements HR must follow in respect to FMLA.
HR guidance on how to confront the legal challenges in managing an employee who is pregnant and preventing discrimination based on pregnancy.