HR Support on Preventing and Responding to Harassment at Work

Editor's Note: Identify and eliminate harassing behavior based on protected class status.

Beth P. ZollerOverview: In addition to sexual harassment in the workplace, federal law as well as most state law prohibits harassment against an individual based on his or her membership in a protected class. Therefore, individuals are protected from harassment based on race, national origin, religion, etc. Harassment may take the form of using insulting epithets, slurs or negative stereotypes; making rude and offensive jokes; threatening, intimidating or hostile acts; or written and graphic material such as cartoons that insult a particular individual or group based on that individual's or group's protected class.

To eliminate workplace harassment, employers should have a policy in place that strictly prohibits harassing behavior of any kind. All employees and supervisors should be provided with training on the policy. Further, employers should designate a multichannel reporting system to allow employees to bring workplace harassment complaints to the employer's attention. Further, employers should immediately respond to any complaints of harassment by investigating the matter and taking corrective action.

Trends: The EEOC has identified preventing harassment through systemic enforcement as well as targeted outreach and education efforts as one of its priorities in the most recent Strategic Enforcement plan. As such. there a significant number of harassment lawsuits being brought by the EEOC as well as individuals based on race, age, religion etc. As the workplace becomes more diverse, this has led to an increase in harassment suits of all kinds.

In Vance v. Ball State University, 570 U.S. (2013), the Supreme Court issued a critical decision which makes it more difficult for employees to prove that an employer is vicariously liable for a supervisor’s discriminatory or harassing conduct. Specifically, the Court held that a supervisor must be someone with the direct power and authority to take tangible employment actions against an employee. This issue is of primary importance when determining whether an employer is vicariously liable for a supervisor's actions in cases of harassment. Under the current law, if the harasser is a supervisor, the employer is automatically vicariously liable for the supervisor's actions. If the harasser is not a supervisor, the plaintiff must prove that the employer was negligent and that the employer knew or should have known of the harassment in order to be liable. This is a much higher burden to meet.

Author: Beth P. Zoller, JD, Legal Editor

Latest items in Harassment

  • Ramadan and the Workplace

    Date:
    22 June 2015
    Type:
    Editor's Choice

  • Guidance on LGBT Rights for Federal Workers Released: Employment Law Manual, Best Practice Manual Updated

    Date:
    15 June 2015
    Type:
    Editor's Choice

    Federal agencies recently reissued an updated guide on protecting lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender federal workers from discrimination and harassment in the workplace.

  • Third-Party Harassment: New How To Added

    Date:
    01 June 2015
    Type:
    Editor's Choice

    To guide employers on how to prevent third party harassment in the workplace and protect employes and co-workers, XpertHR's content has been enhanced with How to Address Third Party Harassment.

  • How to Address Third Party Harassment

    Type:
    How To

    This How To reviews how to implement the proper policies and procedures to minimize the potential for liability regarding third party harassment lawsuits as well as protect an employer's legitimate business interests.

  • How to Prevent Discrimination Based on Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity

    Type:
    How To

    Federal and state laws protect employees from discrimination based on sexual orientation. This How To helps employers recognize potential discrimination issues, protect employees from sexual orientation discrimination and protect themselves from litigation.

  • EEO Handbook Statement [5+ Employees]: California

    Type:
    Employee Handbooks

    California employers with five or more employees for each working day in each of 20 or more consecutive calendar weeks in the current or preceding calendar year are covered under the Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA) for discrimination and harassment purposes and should consider including this model policy statement in their handbook.

  • Sexual Harassment Handbook Statement [1-4 Employees]: California

    Type:
    Employee Handbooks

    California employers with fewer than five employees should consider including this model policy statement in their handbook.

  • Sexual and Other Unlawful Harassment Handbook Statement [5+ Employees]: California

    Type:
    Employee Handbooks

    California employers with five or more employees for each working day in each of 20 or more consecutive calendar weeks in the current or preceding calendar year are covered under the Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA) for discrimination and harassment purposes and should consider including this model policy statement in their handbook.

  • Religious Accommodation Handbook Statement: California

    Type:
    Employee Handbooks

    California employers with five or more employees for each working day in each of 20 or more calendar weeks in the current or preceding calendar year are covered under the Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA) and should consider including this model policy statement in their handbook.

  • EEO Handbook Statement: New Jersey

    Type:
    Employee Handbooks

    New Jersey employers should consider including this model policy statement in their handbook.

About this topic

HR guidance on preventing and responding to workplace harassment, including instituting a policy, providing training to employees and supervisors, and immediately investigating harassment complaints.