Overview: One type of employment contract is the restrictive covenant. Employers should safeguard their trade secrets, client or customer information, employee lists or other information that may give them a competitive edge in their industry by requiring employees to sign a restrictive covenant, i.e., noncompete agreement, nonsolicitation agreement, and/or nondisclosure agreement.
Although restricting the use of this information by employees during and after their term of employment may be vital to the protection of an employer's business, an employer must ensure that the terms of the agreement protects the employer's legitimate business interests and extends no further than is reasonably necessary to protect those interests. Employers should be aware, however, that some states do not enforce restrictive covenants at all, while others place restrictions on the types of information that is confidential, the geographic scope of the covenant as well as the duration.
In addition to requiring a new employee to sign a restrictive covenant before working, employers should also ensure prior to hiring the prospective employee that he or she is not subject to a restrictive covenant with his or her former employer. One way to accomplish this is to request that the new employee sign a representation that he or she is not subject to any restriction on competition or other contractual limitation on his or her ability to do the job.
Trends: Restrictive covenants are often challenged by former employees. Employers should carefully review the terms of their restrictive covenants to ensure they don't force an employee out of the entire industry - this would be considered overbroad and the courts may refuse to enforce the agreement, thereby possibly leaving an employer's proprietary information exposed to a former employee to be used for his or her own benefit.
Author: Melissa A. Silver, JD, Legal Editor
Updated to include information on a state appellate court decision regarding the enforceability of noncompete agreements.
Updated to reflect notice-posting requirements under the New York City Fair Work Practices ordinances and New York City Fast Food Deductions Law, effective November 26, 2017; and amendments to the New York City Earned Sick Time Act.
Updated to reflect New York City law prohibiting salary history inquiries, effective October 31, 2017.
In a ruling that aids employers, the Florida Supreme Court has held that home health service referrals can be a legitimate business interest protected under a noncompetition agreement.
Updated to include information on a Florida Supreme Court ruling regarding legitimate business interests under the state's restrictive covenant law.
Updated to reflect amendments to the Uniform Trade Secrets Act, effective September 1, 2017.
Updated to reflect at-will protections under the Whistleblower's Protection Act.
Veeva Systems, a California-based, cloud-based software provider for the life sciences industries, has filed a claim in the superior court of California against three competitors that use post-termination non-compete, confidentiality and nondisparagement clauses in employment agreements.
Guidance for HR on the advantages of using restrictive covenants.