Topics
In-depth review of the spectrum of Alaska employment law requirements HR must follow with respect to employee privacy.
In-depth review of the spectrum of Virginia employment law requirements HR must follow with respect to employee privacy.
In-depth review of the spectrum of Kansas employment law requirements HR must follow with respect to disability-related leave.
A district court in Pennsylvania held that an employer may require probationary employees in safety sensitive positions to undergo random alcohol testing without violating the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) if it can show that there is a clear business justification and medical necessity. In doing so, the court dismissed a claim filed by the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) on behalf of an employee who was terminated when she obtained a false positive test result due to her diabetes medication. See Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. United Steel, 2013 U.S. Dist. Lexis 22748 (W.D. Pa. 2013).
In-depth review of the spectrum of California employment law requirements HR must follow with respect to disabilities (ADA).
In-depth review of the spectrum of Washington employment law requirements HR must follow with respect to employee privacy.
In-depth review of the spectrum of District of Columbia employment law requirements HR must follow with respect to disabilities.
In-depth review of the spectrum of South Dakota employment law requirements HR must follow with respect to the Americans with Disabilities Act.
In-depth review of the spectrum of Oregon employment law requirements HR must follow with respect to the Americans with Disabilities act.
In-depth review of the spectrum of Maryland employment law requirements HR must follow with respect to disabilities (ADA).
HR and legal considerations for employers regarding medical testing.