Immigration Enforcement: What Employers Need to Know

With the US Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) tripling its number of officers and quintupling the number of enforcement actions in 2018, employers need to be proactive and ensure that their Form I-9 practices are in compliance. Otherwise, employers can be exposed to audits, fines and/or criminal prosecutions, which could include prison time.

In a recent XpertHR webinar, Ogletree Deakins employment attorney Christopher Thomas discussed the following four key Form I-9 compliance tips to help avoid civil and criminal exposure:

1. Properly and Timely Completing the Form I-9

Thomas first stated that the two types of errors that employers make when completing the Form I-9 are technical (e.g., switching first and last names) and substantive (e.g., failing to sign the form). He stated that technical errors are “less bad” than substantive errors, and employers have 10 days to clean up or remediate these errors when they are uncovered by ICE. However, if an employer fails to correct them, technical errors can turn into substantive errors and are then fineable.

With respect to these errors, Thomas “pitched” that employers should photocopy the verification documents employees provide to demonstrate their identities and/or work eligibility. He reasoned that this practice can:

  1. Help convert a substantive error into a technical error;
  2. Help an employer show its good faith effort to be in compliance; and
  3. Minimize the operational impact on an employer when it responds to a Notice of Suspect Documents stemming from an ICE audit.

Further, if a company has kept copies of documents, they could work with outside counsel and use a phased approach in cleaning things up.

However, employers that want to implement a copying policy cannot retroactively ask existing employees for their Form I-9 supporting documentation to make copies. This is because employers can get in trouble with the Immigrant and Employee Rights Section of the Department of Justice if they go too far in asking for documents they don’t necessarily need under the law. As a result, an employer can only make copies of documents going forward for new hires once a copying policy is implemented.

2. Good Faith Belief Individual is Eligible to Work

Employers need to have a good faith belief that their employees are eligible to work in the US. However, when employers are reviewing employee documentation establishing such eligibility, they are not required to be document experts. Instead, Thomas notes that employers must accept documents that “reasonably appear to be genuine AND relate to the person presenting them.”

That brings up the question of, “What is reasonable?” Thomas highlighted some key factors that should alert employers to potential fraudulent documents:

Photos. An employer should be suspicious when a photo does not match an employee. Although people gain or lose weight and age, an employer needs to be sure that the document reasonably looks like the person presenting it.

Cardstock. An employer should also watch out for cards printed on Department of Justice/Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS) cardstock after 2004. Do not accept INS cardstock from 2005 to present since they stopped making them.

Misspellings. It would be very rare to run across a document that has an agency name misspelled. The agency issuing the document should have its name spelled correctly.

Varying font sizes and types. If an employer receives documentation with crazy fonts that seem incorrect or strange, the employer is probably right in being suspicious. However, be careful not to reject a document just because you have not seen that particular version before because that doesn’t mean it’s not real.

Employers need to ensure that they are reviewing the original documents submitted by employees to establish their identities and work eligibility. They must be sitting across from the employer during the document review.

However, what if an employer is hiring a remote employee? In those instances, an employer has a few options to ensure compliance with the Form I-9. One option is to designate an agent to complete the Form I-9 on behalf of the company. This should be someone in a semi-professional capacity, such as a lawyer, accountant, notary republic (subject to state law) or librarian. When the person completes the form on the behalf of the employer under “Title”, he or she should write “designated agent” and sign the form on behalf of the company.

Employers also have software/electronic options. An employer can hire an electronic vendor that has a “brick and mortar” location to serve as a designated agent that employees can visit in person.

Finally, a more costly option is to have a vendor contact and meet the employee at a public setting, such as a Starbucks. The employee can then produce documentation, and the vendor will complete the From I-9 electronically and upload it into the employer’s system automatically.

3. Continuing Good Faith Belief

Thomas next focused on the fact that employers have an ongoing responsibility to monitor their workforce and have a good faith belief that their employees continue to be eligible to work. He stated that this seems to be the biggest “trap” for employers. As a result, an employer cannot ignore the following:

  • If an employee confesses that he or she does not have valid employment authorization;
  • If an employer discovers that there is an improper or missing Form I-9;
  • Department of Homeland Security audit results;
  • Reports that an employee is not lawfully in the US (more than gossip or rumors); and
  • When an employer receives a mismatch letter from the Social Security Administration.

An employer cannot disregard these red flags. Otherwise, if an employer knowingly continues to employ an individual that is not authorized to work in the US, the employer could face five years in prison. In addition, an employer could be exposed to civil penalties for the knowing employment of illegal aliens.

4. Properly Run E-Verify Query

E-Verify use is voluntary unless required under state law or if the Executive Order for federal contracts applies. E-Verify creates a rebuttable presumption that the employer has hired a legal workforce. According to Thomas, it is a great way to start a Form I-9 audit. Thomas warned, however, that this is not a safe harbor and if a company is using E-Verify, it needs to make sure it is using it correctly. Government agencies have uncovered irregularities by employers if they are not using E-Verify properly.

Best Practices

Finally, Thomas highlighted best practices that have been suggested by ICE, including the following:

  • Use E-Verify for all new hires;
  • Have a written compliance policy;
  • Only have trained individuals complete the Form I-9;
  • Establish a protocol when responding to agencies;
  • Create compliance and training programs;
  • Have annual Form I-9 audits;
  • Have a written Form I-9 compliance policy;
  • Implement policies to protect against document abuse;
  • Establish a tip line and mechanisms for individuals to reported suspected undocumented workers; and
  • Maintain clear copies of verification documents.

How does your organization address immigration compliance? Let us know by leaving a comment below.


, , ,