Employer Was Not a Successor in Interest Under the FMLA
-
expand disabled
Sullivan v. Dollar Tree Stores, Inc., 623 F.3d 770 (9th Cir. Wash. 2010) (0 other reports)
Author: Christine P. Corrigan, CPC Writing Services
In Sullivan v. Dollar Tree Stores, Inc., +623 F.3d 770 (9th Cir. Wash. 2010), the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals addressed whether a new employer was a successor in interest to a former employer under the federal Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993 (FMLA), and therefore required to provide an employee leave.
To continue reading, register for free access now.
Register Now
Already a Brightmine HR and Compliance Center user?
Log in
