Want to Read More? To continue reading this article, please Log in or Register Now

Employer Was Not a Successor in Interest Under the FMLA

This report relates to 1 case(s)

  • expand disabled

    Sullivan v. Dollar Tree Stores, Inc., 623 F.3d 770 (9th Cir. Wash. 2010) (0 other reports)

Author: Christine P. Corrigan, CPC Writing Services

In Sullivan v. Dollar Tree Stores, Inc., +623 F.3d 770 (9th Cir. Wash. 2010), the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals addressed whether a new employer was a successor in interest to a former employer under the federal Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993 (FMLA), and therefore required to provide an employee leave.