Overview: Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 prohibits applicant and employee discrimination and harassment based on race, color, sex, religion and national origin. It applies to almost all employers who employ more than 15 employees with some exceptions (i.e., Native American tribes, religious groups, bona fide nonprofit private membership organizations). Further, many states and municipalities maintain similar laws regarding equal opportunity in the workplace.
Title VII applies to all aspects of employment including hiring, firing, promotion and retention. It also prohibits retaliation for complaining of harassment or discrimination.
Title VII prohibits disparate treatment discrimination (treating an individual unfairly based on his or her protected class status) as well as disparate impact discrimination (when a neutral workplace policy or practice negatively affects individuals in a protected class).
In order to comply with Title VII, an employer should make sure to maintain policies and practices that do not discriminate against individuals based on a protected class.
An employer should make sure that all employment decisions are well documented and based upon job-related criteria, rather than the applicant or employee's protected class. This will assist the employer in defending any potential employment discrimination claims.
Further, an employer should aim to provide training to all supervisors and employees regarding its zero tolerance policy for discrimination, harassment and retaliation.
Trends: Since its passage, the parameters of Title VII have continually expanded, and now prohibit sexual harassment, pregnancy discrimination, and more.
In fact just recently, in Macy v. Holder, EEOC No. 012012082, the EEOC ruled that employment discrimination based on gender identity or transgender status is prohibited under Title VII as a form of unlawful sex discrimination.
However, employers should keep in mind that the US Supreme Court has reinforced the notion that religious entities are exempt from Title VII.
In 2012, the Court ruled in Hosanna-Tabor Evangelical Lutheran Church and School v. EEOC, 132 S. Ct. 694 (2012), that the ministerial exception under Title VII and the First Amendment prohibited a teacher who performed religious functions at a parochial school from bringing a claim for employment discrimination.
Author: Beth P. Zoller, JD, Legal Editor
The Supreme Court's ruling in Fort Bend County v. Davis makes it more difficult for employers to dismiss discrimination lawsuits on jurisdictional grounds unless they act in a timely manner.
On this podcast, longtime Proskauer employment attorney Anthony Oncidi and XpertHR Legal Editor David Weisenfeld discuss key developments from the Supreme Court's term, including its latest arbitration rulings.
The Supreme Court has agreed to hear a trio of major cases this fall to resolve whether federal civil rights law protects sexual orientation and gender identity.
A jury has awarded a former KFC worker $1.5 million for discrimination by supervisors that hindered the employee's ability to express breast milk at work.
Under review in relation to District Court ruling regarding EEO-1 pay data.
FY2018 filings by the EEOC showed a large jump in the number of lawsuits filed, especially for sexual harassment cases. The increase in sex-based cases is attributed to the #MeToo movement.
The 6th Circuit Court of Appeals has ruled that Title VII prohibits discrimination based on an employee's transgender or transitioning status.
Gay workers won a major victory with the 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals 10-3 decision that Title VII of the Civil Rights Act bans sexual orientation discrimination.
The US Supreme Court declined to hear an appeal of Evans v. Georgia Regional Hospital, a case that could have settled the question of whether Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 protects employees from discrimination based on sexual orientation.
A supervisor's single use of the "n-word" may be sufficiently severe to support a racial harassment hostile work environment lawsuit, the Philadelphia-based 3rd Circuit Court of Appeals has ruled.
HR guidance on how to maintain and enforce policies and practices that prohibit discrimination, harassment and retaliation under Title VII.