HR Support on Employee Recruiting & Hiring Process

Editor's Note: Be sure to avoid legal landmines when recruiting and hiring job applicants.

David B. WeisenfeldOverview: Employers can engage in a host of measures during the recruiting and hiring process to reduce their risk of liability. These include:

  • Avoiding discriminatory language in job advertisements;
  • Conducting employee background checks;
  • Using at-will employment disclaimers; and
  • Verifying that new hires are authorized to work in the US.

Using due diligence in evaluating qualified job applicants is crucial to avoid a future negligent hiring claim. At the same time, however, employers must be conscious that their screening measures comply with the Fair Credit Reporting Act, and do not disproportionately affect minorities and women.

Other notable HR issues affecting this area include ADA compliance if an employment offer is conditioned on a medical exam; maintaining good recordkeeping practices; and having applicants sign restrictive covenants if an employer wants to protect information that gives it a competitive edge in its industry, provided that the terms are reasonable.

Employers also must be cautious not to inadvertently convert a desired at-will employment relationship into an implied employment contract either when recruiting applicants or in making a job offer.

Trends: Employers in the nation's biggest cities as well as a few states must now take so-called "Ban the Box" laws into account. This phrase refers to the "box" on job application forms asking potential employees if they have been convicted of a crime.

Another key recruiting and hiring trend is the rise of mandatory E-Verify laws to confirm that new hires may lawfully work in the US. These laws requiring employers to use the federal E-Verify system are more prevalent in the South.

Author: David B. Weisenfeld, JD, Legal Editor

Latest items in Recruiting and Hiring

  • Employee Communications: District of Columbia

    Type:
    Employment Law Manual

    In-depth review of the spectrum of District of Columbia employment law requirements HR must follow with respect to employee communications.

  • About This State Supplement Handbook Statement: New Jersey

    Type:
    Employee Handbooks

    New Jersey employers seeking to explain how the handbook and supplement should be read together and that neither the handbook nor the supplement alter an employee's at-will status should consider including this model policy statement in their handbook.

  • Employee Communications: South Carolina

    Type:
    Employment Law Manual

    In-depth review of the spectrum of South Carolina employment law requirements HR must follow with respect to employee communications.

  • Performance Appraisals: Utah

    Type:
    Employment Law Manual

    In-depth review of the spectrum of Utah employment law requirements HR must follow with respect to performance appraisals.

  • Employment Offer: New York

    Type:
    Employment Law Manual

    In-depth review of the spectrum of New York employment law requirements HR must follow with respect to making employment offers.

  • Preemployment Screening and Testing: New York

    Type:
    Employment Law Manual

    In-depth review of the spectrum of New York employment law requirements HR must follow with respect to preemployment screening and testing.

  • Interviewing and Selecting Job Candidates: New York

    Type:
    Employment Law Manual

    In-depth review of the spectrum of New York employment law requirements HR must follow with respect to interviewing and selecting job candidates.

  • Employee Communications: Colorado

    Type:
    Employment Law Manual

    In-depth review of the spectrum of Colorado employment law requirements HR must follow in respect to employee communications.

  • Employee Discipline: District of Columbia

    Type:
    Employment Law Manual

    In-depth review of the spectrum of District of Columbia employment law requirements HR must follow with respect Employee Discipline

  • Connecticut Supreme Court Says Marijuana Convictions Can Be Erased

    Date:
    20 March 2015
    Type:
    News

    The Connecticut Supreme Court has ruled that persons convicted of possessing less than one-half ounce of marijuana have the right to get those convictions erased. The result means that thousands of job applicants previously arrested for marijuana possession may petition for a court order so that records relating to those charges are destroyed and will not be visible during a background check.