HR Support on the Management of Employee Termination

Editor's Note: Comply with federal and state law when terminating employees!

Michael JacobsonOverview: Employee terminations are restricted for certain reasons or without proper procedures. While Title VII of the federal Civil Rights Act prohibits termination which discriminates against protected classes of workers, state law can be more expansive in creating classes of workers who are eligible for such protections, shielding employees who are not covered by federal law. Similarly, some states have broader restrictions against retaliatory terminations for certain types of protected activities, like filing workers' compensation claims and for blowing the whistle on unlawful or wasteful practices in the workplace.

Federal and state law also requires employers to utilize notification procedures when they plan to lay off large numbers of employees or close an entire facility. The federal WARN Act sets the minimum standard for covered employers, but some states impose even stricter requirements on employers based on the number of employees they plan to discharge.

Employees leave a company for other reasons as well, through retirement and resignations, some of which can be viewed as forced resignations or constructive discharges. Exit interviews and managing the exit process should be handled consistently and in compliance with federal and state law.

Trends: Employers are increasingly gravitating toward severance packages for employees terminated involuntarily in exchange for waivers or releases of claims against the employer. With these systems in place, employers can preemptively eliminate post-termination threats by providing outgoing employees with something of value. Employers must be prudent, however, in ensuring that such termination agreements are enforceable by crafting agreements in easily digestible language, providing valuable consideration in exchange for waivers and fully documenting the exchange.

Author: Michael Jacobson, JD, Legal Editor

Latest items in Organizational Exit

  • High-Tech/Software and Communications Resource Center for HR

    Date:
    16 April 2014
    Type:
    Editor's Choice

    XpertHR's High-Tech Resource Center for HR helps high-tech employers handle their most challenging employment issues by bringing relevant resources together in one place for easy access.

  • Mississippi Federal Court: Fired Professor's Religious Speech Not Protected by First Amendment

    Date:
    03 April 2014
    Type:
    News

    A Mississippi federal court has ruled that a public university professor's religious speech to his students and colleagues was not protected from employer discipline or termination by the First Amendment because he spoke on his official capacity as a professor.

  • California Decision Clarifies Eligibility for Unemployment: Employment Law Manual Updated

    Date:
    19 March 2014
    Type:
    Editor's Choice

    A California court determined whether an employee should retain her eligibility for unemployment benefits when her employer claimed that she "constructively quit" her job by making unreasonable demands.

  • Employment At-Will: Kansas

    Type:
    Employment Law Manual

    In-depth review of the spectrum of Kansas employment law requirements HR must follow with respect to the employment at-will doctrine.

  • Alabama's New Notification Requirement for 'Mass Separations': Employment Law Manual Updated

    Date:
    13 March 2014
    Type:
    Editor's Choice

    Alabama employers that typically use group terminations or layoffs should familiarize themselves with the new regulation.

  • Process of Termination

    Type:
    Employment Law Manual

    In-depth review of the process HR should follow when terminating an employee.

  • Voluntary Terminations: California

    Type:
    Employment Law Manual

    In-depth review of the spectrum of California employment law requirements HR must follow with respect to voluntary terminations.

  • EEOC Files Claim Against CVS Over Separation Agreements

    Date:
    20 February 2014
    Type:
    News

    The EEOC alleges in a recently-filed lawsuit that CVS unlawfully violated employees' rights by conditioning the receipt of severance benefits on an "overly broad, misleading and unenforceable" separation agreement that could deter employees from filing discrimination charges or voluntarily communicating with the EEOC. Employers should continue to follow the development of this case as it will likely have an impact on employer separation agreements.

  • New Hampshire Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification (WARN) Notice

    Type:
    Policies and Documents

    As mandated by the New Hampshire Department of Labor, all New Hampshire employers with 100 or more workers must post the New Hampshire Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification (WARN) Notice.

  • Multistate Employer

    Type:
    Employment Law Manual

    Multistate employers face the challenge of complying with not only federal laws, but also differing state and local laws. This section highlights some of the states' differences in terms of preemployment testing and background checks, noncompetition and nonsolicitation agreements, and discrimination, pay and leave rules.

About this topic

Guidance for HR on understanding and complying with federal and state law regarding legal and fair employee terminations.