Overview: In the event of litigation, an effective employee investigation can be extremely persuasive to fact finders like judges and juries. If the employer can show its investigation was prompt, thorough and impartial, it can reduce the employer's exposure. A proper investigation should demonstrate the employer's sincerity in addressing employee complaints, its wherewithal in fixing problems, and its objectivity in assessing the weight of evidence gathered from witnesses.
Employers should take prompt action in preparing for and during the course of investigations to ensure completeness and objectivity. It can accomplish these goals by quickly nominating the correct employee(s) to oversee various aspects of the investigation including interviewing key witnesses and making the final decision when the investigation is complete.
Trends: Employers often take measures to restrict employee activities during the course of investigations. In some cases, those restrictions are appropriate and relevant to the goal of the investigation. For example, if an employer directs employees not to discuss the details of an investigation, it may be justified in issuing such a restriction if it is important to maintain the confidentiality of the complaining witness(es).
However, employers may not issue unnecessary or overly broad restrictions that do not truly advance the goals of conducting the investigation. These types of restrictions undermine the objectivity of the investigation and may also run afoul of the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA) even if the employer does not have a unionized workforce.
Author: Michael Jacobson, JD, Legal Editor
The California Supreme Court has handed a victory to employers in a case involving an employee's alleged misuse of medical leave. In Richey v. AutoNation, Inc., the Court found that an employee out on leave is not entitled to a greater right to reinstatement than other employees.
The Supreme Court heard arguments in a case that asks how far the EEOC must go to try to resolve discrimination claims before suing an employer. The Equal Employment Advisory Counsel's Rae Vann comments to XpertHR about why Mach Mining v. EEOC raises a significant issue affecting employers.
In-depth review of the spectrum of California employment law requirements HR must follow with respect to workers' compensation.
A new podcast puts the National Football League's recent high-profile mistakes in investigating off-field player misconduct under the microscope and offers lessons for employers.
Use this workflow to determine whether progressive discipline should be implemented by the employer and if so, how to navigate through the progressive disciplinary process effectively.
In-depth review of the spectrum of Illinois employment law requirements HR must follow with respect to workers' compensation.
Two additional PowerPoint presentations have been published to be used in conjunction with our Supervisor Briefings. Each of these presentations is specifically designed as a training resource to address critical HR-related issues faced by your managers and supervisors.
HR guidance on the importance of conducting thorough and objective investigations as a tool to guard against and/or defeat litigation.