The National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) has broadened the definition of "joint employer" in a landmark ruling that could make it easier for unions to negotiate on behalf of workers at companies that rely on contractors and franchisees.
In a case that sparked nationwide debate, the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) has declined jurisdiction and, therefore, dismissed an attempt by Northwestern University football players to unionize.
On June 22, 2015, the Morris County Chapter of the Society for Human Resource Management (MC SHRM) held it Eighth Annual Employment Law Symposium, presented in collaboration with Fisher & Phillips, LLP.
The Supreme Court announced on June 30 that it will hear a case challenging the mandatory union dues that nearly all California teachers are currently required to pay. In Friedrichs v. California Teachers Association, the justices will consider the legality of a practice that labor unions consider crucial - collecting dues from all workers whether they belong to a union or not.
In a precedent-setting complaint, the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) has alleged that the US Postal Service (USPS) violated employees' right to collectively bargain about wages, benefits and working conditions when it failed to collectively bargain with the postal workers union over the response to a data security breach.
President Obama has pocket vetoed a congressional resolution that would have overturned a new rule governing union representation election procedures issued by the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB).
National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) General Counsel Richard F. Griffin, Jr., has issued a report concerning recent employer work rule cases. The report discusses and synthesizes a number of recent challenges to employee handbooks and policies that were presented in cases reviewed, challenged or resolved by the Office of the General Counsel.
Newly-elected Illinois Governor Bruce Rauner has issued an executive order to bar unions from requiring all state workers to pay the equivalent of union dues. This order affects an estimated 6,500 state employees who are not union members.
The Supreme Court has ruled unanimously that a group of retired employees are not necessarily entitled to permanent, contribution-free health care benefits. Writing for the Court, Justice Clarence Thomas said, "Employers or other plan sponsors are generally free under ERISA at any time to adopt, modify or terminate welfare plans."
The materials and information included in the XpertHR service are provided for reference purposes only. They are not intended either as a substitute for professional advice or judgment or to provide legal or other advice with respect to particular circumstances. Use of the service is subject to our terms and conditions.
XpertHR is designed to work consistently across a range of browsers, including Internet Explorer, Google Chrome, Mozilla Firefox, Opera and Safari.
If you encounter any issues or problems with our site we would appreciate your feedback.