Overview: Internal employee investigations are one of the most effective proactive measures HR has at its disposal to address problems in the workplace, improve business practices and performance, prevent litigation and where unavoidable, prepare a strong defense. In the process of conducting investigations, however, HR professionals should be mindful of state and federal law to ensure investigations are smooth, productive and lawful.
Some common issues that arise in connection with internal investigations include selecting the right investigator, how and whether to interview certain witnesses, whether to maintain confidentiality of a complaining witness, whether certain methods of investigation, such as wiretapping, run afoul of federal or state law, keeping proper records and deciding how or whether to act when an investigation is complete.
Trends: Employers with a unionized workforce should also be mindful of employee rights under the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA), which enables employees to discuss issues for the purposes of collective bargaining. Recently, the National Labor Relations Board ruled that across-the-board prohibitions on discussions of internal investigations likely violate the NLRA without a showing by the employer that the prohibition serves a legitimate purpose.
Employers without a unionized workforce should also be mindful of absolute restrictions on employee conduct in connection with investigations unless there is a compelling reason to restrict conduct. The common objective of an investigation is to present an open and honest finding to an outside fact finder like a judge, jury or government agency. Thus, unnecessary restrictions on employee conduct could be viewed as oppressive and may undermine the legitimacy of the investigation.
Author: Michael Jacobson, JD, Legal Editor
In-depth review of the spectrum of California employment law requirements HR must follow with respect to workers' compensation.
A new podcast puts the National Football League's recent high-profile mistakes in investigating off-field player misconduct under the microscope and offers lessons for employers.
Use this workflow to determine whether progressive discipline should be implemented by the employer and if so, how to navigate through the progressive disciplinary process effectively.
In-depth review of the spectrum of Illinois employment law requirements HR must follow with respect to workers' compensation.
Before disciplining employees, employers need to implement policies and procedures that enforce rules of conduct and communicate those policies to employees. This section reviews the discipline process, different discipline types, alternatives to discipline and special discipline situations, including attendance, theft, substance abuse and whistleblowers.
Employers are required by law to conduct internal investigations when they learn of certain types of misconduct in the workplace, including sexual harassment, unsafe work practices or violations of federal, state or local laws. This section assists HR professionals in selecting the right investigator, interviewing witnesses, documenting the investigation and concluding the investigation.
This checklist is designed to walk employers through the process of responding to a complaint or allegations before actually launching an internal investigation. Employers are obligated to take quick, effective and reasonable action in responding to workplace complaints, even before they conduct investigations or collect the results of investigations, in order to guard against liability and to protect employees from misconduct.
This How To details the steps a prudent employer should take when faced with a harassment complaint.
HR guidance on conducting and utilizing information obtained from internal employee investigations to reduce legal liability for the employer.