Termination for Cause Policies - HR Support

Editor's Note: Prepare to substantiate for-cause terminations in advance.

Michael JacobsonOverview: The vast majority of employee terminations are terminations for cause, stemming from poor performance, attendance or relations with fellow employees. While employers are not always required to provide evidence substantiating a decision to terminate an employee, best practice is to prepare for such terminations as though such evidence will be required.

HR professionals and supervisors can help reduce employer risks by being proactive before termination for cause. They should speak with problematic employees to address issues that affect their performance in the workplace, conduct candid and thorough performance evaluations, encourage employees to participate in performance management plans and otherwise warn or discipline problematic employees before the final step of termination is required. And throughout this process, HR professionals and supervisors should document all of their dealings with problematic employees, in factual detail, to prepare for litigation.

Trends: Most states protect employees who are retained by specific written or verbal contract from termination without cause, even if the contract does not include such a provision. However, some states require higher levels of proof to substantiate cause than others. In Tennessee, for example, employers bear the burden of proof to establish that good cause for termination is related to the job itself, as opposed to some extraneous influence.

Montana, on the other hand, presumes that all employees are protected by just-cause termination requirements, even if they are not retained by written or verbal contract. This makes Montana the major exception to the employment at-will doctrine.

Author: Michael Jacobson, JD, Legal Editor

Latest items in Termination for Cause

  • Involuntary Terminations: Ohio

    Type:
    Employment Law Manual

    In-depth review of the spectrum of Ohio employment law requirements HR must follow with respect to involuntary terminations.

  • Employment At-Will: Maryland

    Type:
    Employment Law Manual

    In-depth review of the spectrum of Maryland employment law requirements HR must follow with respect to employment at-will doctrine.

  • Employment At-Will: Indiana

    Type:
    Employment Law Manual

    In-depth review of the spectrum of Indiana employment law requirements HR must follow with respect to employment at-will doctrine.

  • Involuntary Terminations: Michigan

    Type:
    Employment Law Manual

    In-depth review of the spectrum of Michigan employment law requirements HR must follow in respect to involuntary terminations.

  • Involuntary Terminations: Arkansas

    Type:
    Employment Law Manual

    In-depth review of the spectrum of Arkansas employment law requirements HR must follow with respect to involuntary terminations.

  • Process of Termination: Arkansas

    Type:
    Employment Law Manual

    In-depth review of the spectrum of Arkansas employment law requirements HR must follow with respect to process of termination.

  • Involuntary Terminations: Tennessee

    Type:
    Employment Law Manual

    In-depth review of the spectrum of Tennessee employment law requirements HR must follow with respect to involuntary terminations.

  • Involuntary Terminations: Texas

    Type:
    Employment Law Manual

    In-depth review of the spectrum of Texas employment law requirements HR must follow in respect to involuntary terminations.

  • Involuntary Terminations: Connecticut

    Type:
    Employment Law Manual

    In-depth review of the spectrum of Connecticut employment law requirements HR must follow with respect to involuntary terminations.

  • Involuntary Terminations: Louisiana

    Type:
    Employment Law Manual

    In-depth review of the spectrum of Louisiana employment law requirements HR must follow with respect to involuntary terminations.

About this topic

HR and legal considerations regarding termination for cause. Guidance on handling these terminations in a way that minimizes risk and liability.