Overview: Before making a job offer, an employer is prohibited from requiring a prospective employee to undergo a medical exam. After making a job offer, medical tests may be conducted so long as they are performed on all applicants in a particular job category and do not discriminate against individuals with disabilities.
However, not all examinations are considered equal under the ADA. For instance, physical fitness tests are not considered medical exams so long as they relate to an essential job function and do not measure physiological or biological responses. Psychological tests designed to measure tastes and habits also do not qualify as medical tests. As a result, these tests may be performed prior to making a job offer.
If an employer does withdraw a job offer because of the results of a medical exam, this withdrawal must be job related and consistent with business necessity. It also is important that employers keep all medical information obtained from an examination confidential, including information that an applicant discloses voluntarily.
Trends: Both the federal government and the states have taken steps to restrict the use of genetic testing in recent years. The Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act (GINA) prohibits using genetic information in employment decisions, and restricts the acquisition and disclosure of such information. Many states have followed suit.
While a few limited exceptions do apply, employers should steer clear of conducting genetic testing or seeking an applicant's family medical history.
Author: David B. Weisenfeld, JD, Legal Editor
Updated to include the medical marijuana law, effective January 3, 2017.
Updated to reflect the forthcoming voter-approved medical marijuana law.
Updated to incorporate the new medical marijuana law, effective September 6, 2016.
Updated to reflect credit information protections under the Philadelphia Fair Employment Practices Ordinance, effective July 7, 2016.
Enhanced to improve the comprehensiveness, organization and scope of coverage.
Updated to reflect Austin's new ban the box criminal history law affecting most private employers, effective April 4, 2016.
Updated to reflect Seattle's new notice and posting requirement under its Fair Chance Employment Ordinance.
In-depth review of the spectrum of New York employment law requirements HR must follow with respect to preemployment screening and testing.
In-depth review of the spectrum of Ohio employment law requirements HR must follow with respect to interviewing and selecting job candidates.
In-depth review of the spectrum of Virginia employment law requirements HR must follow with respect to preemployment screening and testing.
HR guidance on when medical examinations of prospective employees may be conducted.