Overview: Employee discipline can improve communication with employees and foster positive outcomes - but only if used effectively. An employee's professional development may be aided by any number of measures, including targeted employee training and development or a referral to counseling. However, disciplinary action should also be used to ensure compliance with work rules and to promote workplace safety. In addition, employee discipline is a natural next step if an employee has not complied with a performance improvement plan (PIP) or action plan.
Although progressive discipline may be adequate to address many situations, at times immediate suspension or termination must be used. Employers need the proper tools to tackle commonplace workplace discipline situations, such as poor attendance, substance abuse and workplace theft. These tools include a variety of resources to aid in conducting discipline successfully, including internal policies and procedures and customized warnings.
Trends: States continue to enact legislation enlarging employee protections regarding an array of activities, ranging from smoking to voting to weapons possession. In addition, employees continue to make external agency complaints or file court claims under statutes with antiretaliation or whistleblower protections, such as federal and state False Claims Acts. Depending on state law, employers may be restricted from taking a number of actions during a disciplinary investigation, e.g., employee drug or polygraph testing. In other instances, an employer's failure to adequately discipline an employee or to document the results of a disciplinary investigation may pose greater liability problems, such as in the case of an external agency probe or an employment discrimination lawsuit.
Author: Marta Moakley, JD, Legal Editor
In-depth review of the spectrum of District of Columbia employment law requirements HR must follow with respect Employee Discipline
Delaware employers with four or more employees that seek to inform employees about protections provided by the Delaware Whistleblowers Protection Act (DWPA), help fulfill notice obligations under the DWPA and help ensure that employees who engage in activity protected under the DWPA are not subject to retaliation should consider including this model policy statement in their handbook.
This new How To provides step-by-step guidance for addressing employee misconduct on social media while remaining compliant with applicable privacy and labor laws.
Employers need to do everything they can to minimize claims by employees and the government. This section assists HR professionals in implementing proper policies and procedures, and understanding where the greatest risks lay and what the federal government's major enforcement initiatives are.
Voters in Oregon, Alaska and the District of Columbia affirmed ballot measures earlier this month to legalize recreational marijuana use in small amounts. However, none of these laws will prevent employers from maintaining a drug-free workplace policy.
Employers are in an uncharted area with the continuing evolution of social media and its increased use in the workplace for personal as well as work purposes. This how to details the necessary steps employers must take to discipline misconduct related to social media.
In-depth review of the spectrum of New Jersey employment law requirements HR must follow with respect to Employee Discipline
In-depth review of the spectrum of California employment law requirements HR must follow with respect to employee discipline.
In-depth review of the spectrum of Massachusetts employment law requirements HR must follow with respect to employee discipline.
HR and legal considerations regarding fair and consistent employee discipline. Advice on disciplining with effective results, no discrimination.