Overview: Employee discipline can improve communication with employees and foster positive outcomes - but only if used effectively. An employee's professional development may be aided by any number of measures, including targeted employee training and development or a referral to counseling. However, disciplinary action should also be used to ensure compliance with work rules and to promote workplace safety. In addition, employee discipline is a natural next step if an employee has not complied with a performance improvement plan (PIP) or action plan.
Although progressive discipline may be adequate to address many situations, at times immediate suspension or termination must be used. Employers need the proper tools to tackle commonplace workplace discipline situations, such as poor attendance, substance abuse and workplace theft. These tools include a variety of resources to aid in conducting discipline successfully, including internal policies and procedures and customized warnings.
Trends: States continue to enact legislation enlarging employee protections regarding an array of activities, ranging from smoking to voting to weapons possession. In addition, employees continue to make external agency complaints or file court claims under statutes with antiretaliation or whistleblower protections, such as federal and state False Claims Acts. Depending on state law, employers may be restricted from taking a number of actions during a disciplinary investigation, e.g., employee drug or polygraph testing. In other instances, an employer's failure to adequately discipline an employee or to document the results of a disciplinary investigation may pose greater liability problems, such as in the case of an external agency probe or an employment discrimination lawsuit.
Author: Marta Moakley, JD, Legal Editor
District of Columbia employers must provide reasonable accommodations for workers whose ability to perform the functions of their job is limited by pregnancy, childbirth, a related medical condition or breastfeeding, under a new law that took effect March 3.
In-depth review of the spectrum of New Jersey employment law requirements HR must follow with respect to Employee Discipline
In-depth review of the spectrum of District of Columbia employment law requirements HR must follow with respect Employee Discipline
In-depth review of the spectrum of New York employment law requirements HR must follow with respect to employee discipline.
Michigan employees who use medical marijuana may be eligible to collect unemployment benefits.
A paid sick leave ordinance for Tacoma, Washington, which covers all private employers, takes effect January 1, 2016.
In-depth review of the spectrum of California employment law requirements HR must follow with respect to employee discipline.
Philadelphia's new ordinance, taking effect May 13, 2015, will require certain employers to provide paid sick leave.
The Michigan Court of Appeals has ruled that individuals who are state-approved medical marijuana users under the Michigan Medical Marihuana Act (MMMA) should remain eligible to receive unemployment benefits under the Michigan Employment Security Act. The appeals court based its decision in Braska v. Challenge Manufacturing Co. on the fact that the provision of unemployment benefits constitutes state action.
In-depth review of the spectrum of Michigan employment law requirements HR must follow in respect to employee discipline.
HR and legal considerations regarding fair and consistent employee discipline. Advice on disciplining with effective results, no discrimination.