Overview: Employee discipline can improve communication with employees and foster positive outcomes - but only if used effectively. An employee's professional development may be aided by any number of measures, including targeted employee training and development or a referral to counseling. However, disciplinary action should also be used to ensure compliance with work rules and to promote workplace safety. In addition, employee discipline is a natural next step if an employee has not complied with a performance improvement plan (PIP) or action plan.
Although progressive discipline may be adequate to address many situations, at times immediate suspension or termination must be used. Employers need the proper tools to tackle commonplace workplace discipline situations, such as poor attendance, substance abuse and workplace theft. These tools include a variety of resources to aid in conducting discipline successfully, including internal policies and procedures and customized warnings.
Trends: States continue to enact legislation enlarging employee protections regarding an array of activities, ranging from smoking to voting to weapons possession. In addition, employees continue to make external agency complaints or file court claims under statutes with antiretaliation or whistleblower protections, such as federal and state False Claims Acts. Depending on state law, employers may be restricted from taking a number of actions during a disciplinary investigation, e.g., employee drug or polygraph testing. In other instances, an employer's failure to adequately discipline an employee or to document the results of a disciplinary investigation may pose greater liability problems, such as in the case of an external agency probe or an employment discrimination lawsuit.
Author: Marta Moakley, JD, Legal Editor
The City of Spokane, Washington, has passed a paid sick and safe leave ordinance, which takes effect January 1, 2017.
A federal jury in New Hampshire has awarded more than $31 million in damages to a former Wal-Mart pharmacist who claims the nation's largest retailer fired her for raising safety concerns about how it filled prescriptions.
In-depth review of the spectrum of Washington employment law requirements HR must follow with respect to employee discipline.
On December 17, 2015, Seattle Mayor Edward B. Murray signed the Wage Theft Prevention and Harmonization Ordinance amending the municipality's current labor laws addressing paid sick and safe time, job assistance, wage theft and minimum wage. Several sections of the Employment Law Manual, three Quick Reference charts, and three poster landing pages have been updated. Additionally, two new landing pages and four new Legal Timetable entries have been added.
In-depth review of the spectrum of New York employment law requirements HR must follow with respect to performance appraisals.
In-depth review of the spectrum of New York employment law requirements HR must follow with respect to employee discipline.
This section helps HR professionals and employers implement effective and compliant discipline policies and practices. Special attention is paid to special discipline situations, including absenteeism, theft, substance abuse and whistleblowing.
The New Jersey Supreme Court has addressed court remedies for employers in duty of loyalty cases.
Several Washington sections of the Employment Law Manual have been updated in light of a Seattle ordinance allowing drivers of taxicab companies and for-hire drivers of companies to unionize and bargain over terms and conditions of employment.
HR and legal considerations regarding fair and consistent employee discipline. Advice on disciplining with effective results, no discrimination.