Overview: Employee discipline can improve communication with employees and foster positive outcomes - but only if used effectively. An employee's professional development may be aided by any number of measures, including targeted employee training and development or a referral to counseling. However, disciplinary action should also be used to ensure compliance with work rules and to promote workplace safety. In addition, employee discipline is a natural next step if an employee has not complied with a performance improvement plan (PIP) or action plan.
Although progressive discipline may be adequate to address many situations, at times immediate suspension or termination must be used. Employers need the proper tools to tackle commonplace workplace discipline situations, such as poor attendance, substance abuse and workplace theft. These tools include a variety of resources to aid in conducting discipline successfully, including internal policies and procedures and customized warnings.
Trends: States continue to enact legislation enlarging employee protections regarding an array of activities, ranging from smoking to voting to weapons possession. In addition, employees continue to make external agency complaints or file court claims under statutes with antiretaliation or whistleblower protections, such as federal and state False Claims Acts. Depending on state law, employers may be restricted from taking a number of actions during a disciplinary investigation, e.g., employee drug or polygraph testing. In other instances, an employer's failure to adequately discipline an employee or to document the results of a disciplinary investigation may pose greater liability problems, such as in the case of an external agency probe or an employment discrimination lawsuit.
Author: Marta Moakley, JD, Legal Editor
In-depth review of the spectrum of Tennessee employment law requirements HR must follow with respect to employee discipline.
Tennessee Governor Bill Haslam has signed into law a bill that changes the state's "Guns in Trunks" law.
Before disciplining employees, employers need to implement policies and procedures that enforce rules of conduct and communicate those policies to employees. This section reviews the discipline process, different discipline types, alternatives to discipline and special discipline situations, including attendance, theft, substance abuse and whistleblowers.
In-depth review of the spectrum of Arkansas employment law requirements HR must follow with respect to employee discipline.
The District of Columbia's Wage Theft Prevention Amendment Act of 2014 and its emergency amendments recently took effect. Several sections of XpertHR are affected and have been updated.
Employers often provide leave benefits that are required by state law or that help the employer attract and retain employees. This section assists HR professionals in managing leave policies related to religion; catastrophic illness; pandemics; holidays; bereavement; voting/elections; jury duty; school visitation; community service; blood, organ or bone marrow donation; and breastfeeding.
The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) initiated a first-of-its-kind enforcement action intended to regulate confidentiality provisions in a workplace agreement that could potentially stifle whistleblowers.
Employers need to do everything they can to minimize claims by employees and the government. This section assists HR professionals in implementing proper policies and procedures, and understanding where the greatest risks lay and what the federal government's major enforcement initiatives are.
In-depth review of the spectrum of Virginia employment law requirements HR must follow with respect to employee discipline.
HR and legal considerations regarding fair and consistent employee discipline. Advice on disciplining with effective results, no discrimination.