Overview: Employers need to consider many laws and benefits when an employee discloses she is pregnant. Applicable laws include the Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA), the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and state law(s). Other important considerations are employer policies, legally required benefits such as short-term disability (STD) or paid leave insurance, and any collective bargaining agreements that may provide for paid leave.
Employers must be careful not to discriminate against pregnant employees or fail to accommodate pregnant employees when applicable. The Pregnancy Discrimination Act (PDA) prohibits employers with 15 or more employees from discriminating against female employees or job applicants based on pregnancy, childbirth or related medical conditions. As a result, employers may not refuse to hire an applicant because she discloses she is pregnant or fire an employee because she is pregnant. In the leave context, employers must look at requests for maternity leave or leave before the birth of a child for medical conditions under the same terms and conditions it applies to employees with other types of medical conditions.
Also, when disciplining or terminating pregnant employees or employees out on job protected FMLA leave, employers must make sure that their decision to discipline or terminate is not motivated by the employee's pregnancy or maternity leave. Documentation backing up the reason for discipline or termination is critical.
Trends: Some states, such as California and New Jersey, provide paid leave benefits to employees out on maternity leave.
The Pregnant Workers Fairness Act has been introduced in the US Senate. This law, if passed, would supplement the PDA by requiring employers to reasonably accommodate pregnant employees or job applicants, as well as those limited by childbirth or related medical conditions, unless the employer could show that it caused an undue hardship such as a significant difficulty or expense. This is similar to the accommodation requirement under the ADA. Employers would also be prohibited from making an unfavorable employment decision based on pregnancy or the taking of leave for pregnancy-related reasons.
A number of states and cities, including California, Maryland, Minnesota, New Jersey, New York City, Philadelphia and West Virginia, have taken matters into their own hands by passing laws requiring employers to reasonably accommodate pregnant employees.
Author: Melissa S. Burdorf, JD, Legal Editor
Updated to reflect the forthcoming Employee Sick Leave Act.
Updated to incorporate pregnancy accommodation requirements, effective August 10, 2016.
Updated to reflect the forthcoming Minneapolis Sick and Safe Time Ordinance.
Updated policy and guidance to reflect an amendment to the Connecticut Family and Medical Leave Act allowing leave for a qualified military exigency, effective June 7, 2016.
Updated to reflect the addition of military exigencies as a qualifying reason for taking leave under the Connecticut Family and Medical Leave Act, effective June 7, 2016.
Revised to incorporate New York City pregnancy accommodation enforcement guidance, issued May 6, 2016.
Revised to incorporate pregnancy accommodation requirements, effective May 10, 2016.
Updated to include information on individual liability under the federal FMLA in a federal court ruling covering Vermont employers.
San Francisco will become the first US city to require employers to offer six weeks of fully paid parental leave to new parents. This groundbreaking ordinance will apply to same-sex and opposite-sex couples.
Updated when to include, policy and guidance to reflect amendments to the Fair Employment and Housing Act regulations, effective April 1, 2016.
HR guidance on legal obligations related to employee pregnancy and maternity.