Overview: If an employee notifies the employer of a workplace injury, incident or suspected illness, HR must correspond with the employer's workers' compensation insurance carrier (if any) to ensure the carrier is promptly notified. In most cases, notification to the carrier also requires substantial information regarding the incident, the injured or ill employee's job description and classification, a detailed description of the circumstances and the identities of witnesses.
The employer may also wish to perform an internal investigation regarding the circumstances leading up to and including the incident once it has satisfied the carrier's notification requirements. Depending on the results of the investigation, the employer may dispute the validity of the claim by offering one or more defenses including that: (i) the employee was an independent contractor (not truly an employee whose work is controlled and overseen by the employer); (ii) the "going and coming" rule (the employee was injured during his or her commute, for example); (iii) the injuries were the result of intentional conduct; (iv) the employee was intoxicated or (v) the injuries were pre-existing. The validity of each of these defenses turns - in large part - on state law considerations.
Trends: The trend in this area of the law is to reduce the number of injuries and illnesses that are considered "compensable" under the system, while also streamlining the claims process to reduce its impact on state court systems. Despite this trend, the employer still has an obligation to fully and accurately retain documentation on all actions from the moment it is notified of a potential claim to the moment the employee returns to work or is terminated from employment. Accurate, factual and fair records are always the employer's best defense against exposure from workers' compensation claims.
Author: Michael Jacobson, JD, Legal Editor
As mandated by the Rhode Island Department of Labor and Training, all employers subject to the Workers' Compensation Act must post the Rhode Island Workers' Compensation Act poster.
In-depth review of the spectrum of Washington employment law requirements HR must follow with respect to unemployment insurance tax (FUTA/SUTA).
California has passed legislation which amends its Labor Code to restrict out-of-state professional athletes from pursuing claims for workers' compensation. The new bill is another example of California's push to reform its workers' compensation scheme, on the heels of a complete overhaul of the workers' compensation law in September 2012.
In-depth review of the spectrum of California employment law requirements HR must follow with respect to workers' compensation.
In-depth review of the spectrum of Ohio employment law requirements HR must follow with respect unemployment insurance tax (FUTA/SUTA).
In-depth review of the spectrum of Oregon employment law requirements HR must follow with respect to unemployment insurance tax (FUTA/SUTA).
In-depth review of the spectrum of Minnesota employment law requirements HR must follow with respect to workers' compensation.
A Florida appeals court held that specific language in an arbitration agreement meant that the employer could arbitrate a workers' compensation retaliation claim, while preserving an exception the employer created to avoid arbitrating workers' compensation benefits claims.
Workers' compensation sections for Vermont, Maryland, Tennessee, Louisiana and the District of Columbia have been updated recently to reflect legislative changes this summer. Many of the new regulations go into effect on October 1, 2013 or on January 1, 2014, so employers should familiarize themselves with the developments and plan accordingly.