Prohibited Conduct

Editor's Note: Alert employees and supervisors as to what types of workplace conduct is strictly prohibited.

Beth P. ZollerOverview: Employers should make sure that their policies and practices clearly convey to employees and supervisors the type of conduct that is strictly prohibited by the employer.

This may include, but is not limited to: violence/fighting; verbal abuse; theft; possession or use of illegal drugs in the workplace; inappropriate use of the internet, email, voice mail or other forms of electronic communication; sleeping and loafing on the job; gambling at work; workplace bullying; and harassment or employee discrimination.

These types of activities can have a detrimental effect on the employer's business as well as employee productivity and morale. Employers should make sure that employees and supervisors understand the parameters of prohibited conduct and let them know the disciplinary consequences.

The policies regarding prohibited conduct should be clearly defined so employees and supervisors are well aware of the employer's expectations. Further, all employees and supervisors should be instructed to report any prohibited conduct by co-workers or supervisors and bring it to the employer's attention so that corrective measures may be taken.

Trends: While employers have a clear right to manage their workforce and implement workplace rules and policies regarding prohibited conduct, employers should be careful due to recent guidance from the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB).

The NLRB has demonstrated that it is willing to strike down facially neutral employment policies which violate the right of both union and non-union employees to engage in protected concerted activity or collective action to improve workplace conditions under Section 7 of the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA).

For example, the NLRB has invalidated workplace polices that sought to make employee solicitation and social media use at work prohibited conduct because it determined that this may prevent employees from engaging in protected activity.

Thus, employers should narrowly draft policies and use specific examples of protected conduct to show that the employer is not trying to interfere with employee rights, but instead trying to protect the employer's legitimate business interests.

Author: Beth P. Zoller, JD, Legal Editor

Latest items in Prohibited Conduct

  • Smoke-Free Workplace Handbook Statement: South Carolina

    Type:
    Employee Handbooks

    South Carolina employers with enclosed workplace areas should consider including this model policy statement in their handbook.

  • Smoke-Free Workplace Handbook Statement: Tennessee

    Type:
    Employee Handbooks

    Tennessee employers with enclosed workplace areas should consider including this model policy statement in their handbook.

  • Smoke-Free Workplace Handbook Statement: Kansas

    Type:
    Employee Handbooks

    Kansas employers with enclosed workplace areas should consider including this model policy statement in their handbook.

  • Smoke-Free Workplace Handbook Statement: Missouri

    Type:
    Employee Handbooks

    Missouri employers with enclosed workplace areas should consider including this model policy statement in their handbook.

  • Cell Phone Use / Texting While Driving Handbook Statement: Indiana

    Type:
    Employee Handbooks

    Indiana employers seeking to show their compliance with Indiana's law prohibiting texting while driving, to promote driving safety and to limit liability from accidents involving employees who are driving or using electronic devices for work-related purposes or while driving a company-owned vehicle should consider including this model policy statement in their handbook.

  • Smoke-Free Workplace Handbook Statement: Iowa

    Type:
    Employee Handbooks

    Iowa employers with enclosed workplace areas should consider including this model policy statement in their handbook.

  • Smoke-Free Workplace Handbook Statement: Alabama

    Type:
    Employee Handbooks

    Alabama employers with enclosed workplace areas should consider including this model policy statement in their handbook.

  • Smoke-Free Workplace Handbook Statement: North Dakota

    Type:
    Employee Handbooks

    North Dakota employers with enclosed workplace areas seeking to inform employees that smoking is prohibited in the workplace and to demonstrate compliance with North Dakota law should consider including this model policy statement in their handbook.

  • Weapons in the Workplace Handbook Statement: North Dakota

    Type:
    Employee Handbooks

    North Dakota employers seeking to prevent workplace violence, provide notice that weapons will not be permitted inside the workplace and show their compliance with the North Dakota law that gives employees the right to keep a lawfully possessed firearm inside a locked personal vehicle in a company parking lot should consider including this model policy statement in their handbook.

  • Weapons in the Workplace Handbook Statement: Michigan

    Type:
    Employee Handbooks

    Michigan employers seeking to limit or prohibit weapons in the workplace, prevent workplace violence and demonstrate their compliance with the Michigan law that gives employees the right to keep a lawfully possessed firearm inside a locked personal vehicle in certain company parking lots should consider including this model policy statement in their handbook.

About this topic

HR guidance on ensuring that policies adequately advise employees and supervisors of prohibited workplace conduct and the consequences of engaging in such behavior.