Overview: Employers should make sure that their policies and practices clearly convey to employees and supervisors the type of conduct that is strictly prohibited by the employer.
This may include, but is not limited to: violence/fighting; verbal abuse; theft; possession or use of illegal drugs in the workplace; inappropriate use of the internet, email, voice mail or other forms of electronic communication; sleeping and loafing on the job; gambling at work; workplace bullying; and harassment or employee discrimination.
These types of activities can have a detrimental effect on the employer's business as well as employee productivity and morale. Employers should make sure that employees and supervisors understand the parameters of prohibited conduct and let them know the disciplinary consequences.
The policies regarding prohibited conduct should be clearly defined so employees and supervisors are well aware of the employer's expectations. Further, all employees and supervisors should be instructed to report any prohibited conduct by co-workers or supervisors and bring it to the employer's attention so that corrective measures may be taken.
Trends: While employers have a clear right to manage their workforce and implement workplace rules and policies regarding prohibited conduct, employers should be careful due to recent guidance from the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB).
The NLRB has demonstrated that it is willing to strike down facially neutral employment policies which violate the right of both union and non-union employees to engage in protected concerted activity or collective action to improve workplace conditions under Section 7 of the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA).
For example, the NLRB has invalidated workplace polices that sought to make employee solicitation and social media use at work prohibited conduct because it determined that this may prevent employees from engaging in protected activity.
Thus, employers should narrowly draft policies and use specific examples of protected conduct to show that the employer is not trying to interfere with employee rights, but instead trying to protect the employer's legitimate business interests.
Author: Beth P. Zoller, JD, Legal Editor
Tennessee is the first state to pass an antibullying law aimed at addressing abusive workplace conduct.
Indianapolis employment attorney Jeffrey Beck, a partner with Faegre Baker Daniels, appears on a new XpertHR podcast to discuss the troubling trend of workplace bullying and the steps an employer can take to keep its facility bully free.
A new podcast features an in-depth look at workplace bullying and steps employers can take to prevent it with Indianapolis employment attorney Jeff Beck of Faegre Baker Daniels.
This briefing for supervisors examines the law and best practices regarding bullying and harassment in the workplace, including recognizing and preventing bullying and harassing behavior, conducting investigations and employer liability.
In-depth review of the spectrum of Alabama employment law requirements HR must follow with respect to employee conduct.
In-depth review of the spectrum of Louisiana employment law requirements HR must follow with respect to employee handbooks, work rules and employee conduct.
A Mississippi federal court has ruled that a public university professor's religious speech to his students and colleagues was not protected from employer discipline or termination by the First Amendment because he spoke on his official capacity as a professor.
As mandated by the New Jersey Division on Civil Rights, all places of public accommodation that are covered by the New Jersey Law Against Discrimination must post the New Jersey Law Prohibits Discrimination in Places of Public Accommodation Poster.
As mandated by the Connecticut Commission of Human Rights and Opportunities, all Connecticut employers must post the Connecticut Discrimination Is Illegal Poster.
HR guidance on ensuring that policies adequately advise employees and supervisors of prohibited workplace conduct and the consequences of engaging in such behavior.