Overview: Retaining accurate and consistent records in an organized fashion may be the best defense against: (i) an employee court claim; (ii) regulatory fines; and (iii) misperceptions/mischaracterizations of internal policies and procedures. Failing to keep adequate records renders an organization more susceptible to a court's award of damages.
Optimal recordkeeping practices require striking a balance between too many and too few documents. Employers need to avoid keeping duplicative documents, while taking care to maintain all relevant documentation for the recommended retention period. Identifying when too much documentation is too much, or when silence on a subject may pose greater liability to the employer, is simplified when an organization implements an effective document retention schedule.
Trends: Federal and state agencies have continued their focus on proactive enforcement activities. A number of agencies have added large numbers of investigators and auditors to their ranks, thereby increasing the likelihood and frequency of external audits or investigations for employers. For example, the IRS increasingly conducts audits on employer-mandated reporting requirements, and any applicable underlying documentation. In addition, the Department of Homeland Security's Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) conducts strategic audits of employee I-9 forms. Appropriate recordkeeping habits may assist an employer in avoiding greater penalties for "knowing" violations of the laws by showing, at the very least, "good faith" attempts at compliance.
Author: Marta Moakley, JD, Legal Editor
This XpertHR podcast features a look at the increased use by employers of biometrics to help manage employees. A pair of experts examine the benefits and risks of this technology.
Multistate employers face the challenge of complying with not only federal laws, but also differing state and local laws. This section highlights some of the states' differences in terms of preemployment testing and background checks, noncompetition and nonsolicitation agreements, and discrimination, pay and leave rules.
As mandated by the New Jersey Department of Labor and Workforce Development, New Jersey employers must post the New Jersey Employer Obligation to Maintain and Report Records Poster.
Proper documentation often proves to be the source of an employer's best defenses against employment-related claims. This section assists HR professionals in understanding what documents to keep, how long to keep them and how to maintain confidentiality.
In-depth review of the spectrum of federal legal requirements HR must follow when handling external investigations.
Employers are required by law to conduct internal investigations when they learn of certain types of misconduct in the workplace, including sexual harassment, unsafe work practices or violations of federal, state or local laws. This section assists HR professionals in selecting the right investigator, interviewing witnesses, documenting the investigation and concluding the investigation.
Employees and job applicants generate many records that must be maintained and stored by employers for legal and practical reasons. This section reviews best practices for maintaining paper and electronic records.
The Recruiting and Hiring > Affirmative Action Planning and the Employee Management > Training and Development sections of the Employment Law Manual have been updated to reflect the newly-adopted hiring and recordkeeping requirements for federal contractors.
The Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) requires employers to keep certain records about employees' compensation. This section reviews the FLSA's recordkeeping requirements for exempt and nonexempt employees, and requirements on how long records must be kept, making records available for inspection, the use of time clocks and other issues.
In-depth review of the spectrum of Minnesota employment law requirements HR must follow with respect to employee discipline.
HR guidance on the legal risks and benefits of recordkeeping.