Overview: Retaining accurate and consistent records in an organized fashion may be the best defense against: (i) an employee court claim; (ii) regulatory fines; and (iii) misperceptions/mischaracterizations of internal policies and procedures. Failing to keep adequate records renders an organization more susceptible to a court's award of damages.
Optimal recordkeeping practices require striking a balance between too many and too few documents. Employers need to avoid keeping duplicative documents, while taking care to maintain all relevant documentation for the recommended retention period. Identifying when too much documentation is too much, or when silence on a subject may pose greater liability to the employer, is simplified when an organization implements an effective document retention schedule.
Trends: Federal and state agencies have continued their focus on proactive enforcement activities. A number of agencies have added large numbers of investigators and auditors to their ranks, thereby increasing the likelihood and frequency of external audits or investigations for employers. For example, the IRS increasingly conducts audits on employer-mandated reporting requirements, and any applicable underlying documentation. In addition, the Department of Homeland Security's Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) conducts strategic audits of employee I-9 forms. Appropriate recordkeeping habits may assist an employer in avoiding greater penalties for "knowing" violations of the laws by showing, at the very least, "good faith" attempts at compliance.
Author: Marta Moakley, JD, Legal Editor
Updated to reflect whistleblower protections in the federal Taxpayer First Act, an amendment prohibiting discrimination based on reproductive health decisions in Hawaii, amendments to medical marijuana law in New Jersey and amendments regarding service animals in Rhode Island.
Updated to reflect retaliation protections in the state wage theft law, effective July 1, 2019.
Updated to include amendments regarding electronic cigarettes, effective July 1, 2019.
As mandated by the Minnesota Department of Labor and Industry (DLI), covered employers must provide each employee the Minnesota Wage Theft Notice.
Virginia employers seeking to inform employees of the rules surrounding the review of employee personnel files should consider including this model policy statement in their handbook.
Use this form to document the completion of sexual harassment prevention training by a covered employee under New York City requirements.
Updated to reflect proposed regulations that would update and revise the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) overtime exemption requirements.
As recommended by the Social Security Administration, employers that have been notified that they need to correct a name or social security number that was submitted on an employee's wage and tax statement (Form W-2) may use this sample letter to inform the employee.
Under review in relation to District Court ruling regarding EEO-1 pay data.
HR guidance on the legal risks and benefits of recordkeeping.